Skip to main content

Please enter a keyword and click the arrow to search the site

Cumulative and career-stage citation impact of social psychology programs and their members


Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin


Organisational Behaviour

Authors / Editors

Nosek B A;Graham J;Lindner N M;Kesebir S;Hawkins C B;Hahn C;Motyl M;Joy-Gaba J;Frazier R;Tenney E R


Publication Year



Number of citations and the h-index are popular metrics for indexing scientific impact. These, and other existing metrics, are strongly related to scientists’ seniority. This article introduces complementary indicators that are unrelated to the number of years since PhD. To illustrate cumulative and career-stage approaches for assessing the scientific impact across a discipline, citations for 611 scientists from 97 U.S. and Canadian social psychology programs are amassed and analyzed. Results provide benchmarks for evaluating impact across the career span in psychology and other disciplines with similar citation patterns. Career-stage indicators provide a very different perspective on individual and program impact than cumulative impact, and may predict emerging scientists and programs. Comparing social groups, Whites and men had higher impact than non-Whites and women, respectively. However, average differences in career stage accounted for most of the difference for both groups.


Citations; Scientific impact; H-index; Scientific awards; Gender differences

Available on ECCH


Select up to 4 programmes to compare

Select one more to compare
subscribe_image_desktop 5949B9BFE33243D782D1C7A17E3345D0

Sign up to receive our latest news and business thinking direct to your inbox