When payment undermines the pitch : on the persuasiveness of pure motives in fund-raising
Journal
Psychological Science
Subject
Marketing
Publishing details
Authors / Editors
Barash A;Berman J Z;Small D A
Biographies
Publication Year
2016
Abstract
Studies on crowding out document that incentives sometimes backfire—decreasing motivation in prosocial tasks. In the present research, we demonstrated an additional channel through which incentives can be harmful. Incentivized advocates for a cause are perceived as less sincere than nonincentivized advocates and are ultimately less effective in persuading other people to donate. Further, the negative effects of incentives hold only when the incentives imply a selfish motive; advocates who are offered a matching incentive (i.e., who are told that the donations they successfully solicit will be matched), which is not incompatible with altruism, perform just as well as those who are not incentivized. Thus, incentives may affect prosocial outcomes in ways not previously investigated: by crowding out individuals’ sincerity of expression and thus their ability to gain support for a cause.
Publication Notes
Incentives; Prosocial behavior; Altruism; Sincerity; Crowding out; Open data; Open materials
Available on ECCH
No