Skip to main content

Please enter a keyword and click the arrow to search the site

The effect of mergers on US bank risk in the short run and in the long run



Publishing details

Social Sciences Research Network

Authors / Editors

Brealey R;Cooper I;Kaplanis E

Publication Year



We examine changes in risk following US bank mergers in the period 1981-2014. Using standard event study measurements of short-run changes we show that mergers increased systematic risk but not equity volatility. Using a new approach to measure long-run changes we then find that the changes in risk are consistent with banks maintaining their equity risk in the long run. We measure the loss of diversification of the US bank industry caused by mergers and find it to be 40% of the risk level in 1981. Almost all of this occurred prior to 2004. The results are consistent with a constant risk culture of acquirer banks. They are not consistent with banks taking advantage of the “too-big-to-fail” put option unless they do so only through increasing systematic risk. They may be consistent with the “concentration-fragility” hypothesis.


Bank mergers; Bank risk Bank regulation; Too big to fail; Concentration-fragility


Social Sciences Research Network

Available on ECCH


Select up to 4 programmes to compare

Select one more to compare
subscribe_image_desktop 5949B9BFE33243D782D1C7A17E3345D0

Sign up to receive our latest news and business thinking direct to your inbox


Sign up to receive our latest course information and business thinking

Leave your details above if you would like to receive emails containing the latest thought leadership, invitations to events and news about courses that could enhance your career. If you would prefer not to receive our emails, you can still access the case study by clicking the button below. You can opt-out of receiving our emails at any time by visiting: or by unsubscribing through the link provided in our emails. View our Privacy Policy for more information on your rights.