The pace of technological innovation is breathtaking. It is having an impact on virtually every aspect of our lives. And it will continue to do so – in many ways that we can’t yet imagine.
Late last year I found myself gazing down quite affectionately at a robot at the entrance to a Softbank store in Tokyo. The size of a child, it had angled its head towards me and was using its articulated hands to gesture as it chattered away. As I bent down to gaze into its eyes I was enchanted.
I’m impressed (though not as enchanted) with my recently-bought car. Generally, the buyer of vintage cars (or what my children would call ‘old’), I’ve suddenly leapt to a car capable of parking itself. I’m the owner of a mass-market vehicle that has the inbuilt intelligence to gently manoeuvre itself into a space by the kerb.
The striking point is not that there is such a thing as a retail robot or a self- parking car: such technologies are likely to become run-of-the-mill within a relatively short time. What was far more significant is that just a few years ago, I wouldn’t have predicted that I would feel such affection for a little robot or own a vehicle quite that clever.
Nowhere is this more true than in the sphere of work. When I launched the Future of Work research consortium seven years ago, my interest was in how work would change. I got in touch with executives in more than 100 companies across the world to discover their thinking on technological innovations and the rate at which they are adopted. It is clear to me that never before has there been a greater need to be adaptable. To survive and prosper, we must be nimble and be prepared for a working world not yet imagined.
At the World Economic Forum at Davos in 2015, I moderated a conversation with some of the world’s leading artificial intelligence (AI) experts. It was a fascinating conversation that was reported in the Daily Telegraph the following day under the ‘robots destroy jobs’ theme. Two years later, it is no surprise that many people are anxious about the likely impact that AI and robotics will have on their jobs: indeed, will their jobs be automated out of existence? The repercussions have already been felt by many people in medium-skilled jobs. When was the last time you went into a bank to cash a cheque, watching while the teller counted out notes? How soon will it be before you, like me, will be enchanted by a diminutive robot in your local bank?
When my co-author Professor Andrew Scott and I wrote The 100-year Life, it became clear to us that whilst increasing longevity meant significantly longer working lives, the real challenge is that longer working lives are coming at a time of significant technological innovation and change. The result is that we are trying to make investments and plans about a future working life that frankly we know little about. Look at the questions we face when we believe we face an unknowable future: what skills should I invest in developing and what jobs should I prepare for?
But is the future really so unknowable? Perhaps the long-term – more than 10 years - is impossible to imagine, but there are signals that can help us think about the short and medium term.
One signal to look at is where the investment money is going. Driverless cars are an obvious and high-profile example: significant amounts of resources and effort are currently being put into the development of autonomous vehicles that are reliable, efficient and safe. If all that research pays off, then we can imagine the effect on jobs. Clearly the impact on lorry drivers will be profound: a large cohort of relatively low-skilled, mainly male employees will be displaced.
A second signal is how people feel about these technological innovations and how quickly companies are prepared to adopt them. Perhaps the more we interact with robots, for example, the more comfortable we will feel about having them care for us when we are older. That positive interaction I had in Tokyo with the cute Softbank robot could well be the beginning of my changing attitude to robots. This is important because our feelings about technologies will affect the rate at which those new technologies diffuse through our organisations and society. For companies, the diffusion rate will also be a function of the cost of labour: it makes more sense to invest in AI and robots if hourly wage rates are $25 than it does if they are $10.
However, even with these clues, accurately predicting scale and speed is hard. Sometimes we under-predict the rate of diffusion of certain technologies. Think about smart phones which were virtually unknown two decades ago, but which we now take for granted. We can also over-predict the speed at which other technologies will appear in our lives: I don’t believe in the short or medium term that you will see robots with arms and legs whirring down the corridor outside your office. Will C-3PO step off the screen of Star Wars and invade our lives? Not for a while.
So as we plan for the future, we are confronted by a number of imponderables about both scale and velocity. So what do we know?
Technology does not simply replace work. It can also create the opportunity for new types of work to flourish
We know that AI and robotics have already had an impact on work – particularly medium skilled jobs. This has resulted in a phenomenon termed the ‘hollowing out of work’. Many of those jobs that had been replaced by technology were those requiring medium levels of skill – for example working in a bank or on a factory floor.
Looking ahead, it is clear that these technologies are now impacting on the extremities of the skills spectrum – on both low skill and high skill work.
The effects of this widening impact on the skill spectrum could be profound. Right now in the UK for example, around 45 percent of jobs are categorised as low-skilled. And at the high-skill end, expect change: human activities such as diagnostics, analysis of complex data or even surgical procedures are all areas where developments in technology are already under way that could change how people work. That is why commentators such as Andy Haldane the chief economist at the Bank of England has said that he thinks up to 15 million jobs in the UK could be replaced by automation: “Technology appears to be resulting in faster, wider and deeper degrees of hollowing-out than in the past.”
But technology does not simply replace work. It can also create the opportunity for new types of work to flourish. As the Bank of England governor Mark Carney has said, “every technological revolution mercilessly destroys both jobs and livelihoods… well before the new ones emerge.”. The question is, what are these new jobs? Certainly there has already been a significant increase in “digital jobs” – jobs requiring high social skills, high cognitive skills, or a mixture of both – that exploit the output of new technologies rather than working within those technologies. Look at areas such as app developers, data miners and digital marketing specialists for an idea of what these jobs could be. Yet it is important to realise that whilst the percentage increase in these types of jobs has been significant and will undoubtedly continue, in terms of total employment, the numbers aren’t huge.
Could a robot do your job better than you?
So given all we currently know, and what we currently know we don’t know, how do we prepare for this unknown future? This is the question I put to my second year MBA elective class focused on the ‘future of work’. Here are the three pieces of advice I give to my students:
This is my advice to my students. But what about the wider world, what are some of the societal issues that advances in AI and technology will bring?
I would expect a clear narrative to emerge around the need for re-skilling. This will be taken up by some governments and some corporations. For many of my students and alumni, the idea of upskilling is already part of the narrative of their careers. Those in the middle are fast coming to realise the need to acquire new competences. Insurance group Aviva has made this explicit to its 16,000 UK staff. It has presented them with a blunt question: could a robot do your job better than you? Those who answer yes aren’t then being handed their P45; instead, they will be retrained for a new role.
There will also be a narrative emerging about those people employed in low-skill work. The government will need to ask how those from redundant low-skill jobs can be retrained to take on new roles where humans perform better than machines. (This is the issue alluded to by Andy Haldane.) Take for example the large numbers of redundant truck drivers replaced in the medium or long term by driverless cars. Will they segue into jobs requiring a real human touch? Will these truck drivers become hairdressers or restaurant waiters? We know from the experience in Detroit that when car plants shut down, some men from manual jobs lacked transferrable skills and struggled to find new employment. This is a key issue: as Larry Summers has pointed out, it is often hard for men to make the shift from traditional manual occupations into jobs which are usually regarded as more feminine. Much will need to be done to create possible pathways to new jobs and to support the training bridges that connect the old with the new.
C-3PO is not our master
In part, these wholescale skill shifts will be eased by technological innovations. For example, there is a growing body of internet platforms that match freelancers with businesses that need a particular task performed. There is also the promise of platforms creating opportunities for people to build their own businesses, tapping into a potentially global market of suppliers and customers. So rather than simply finding a job, perhaps the new mantra will be building a job. Of course there is no doubt that this requires lateral thinking, flexibility and imagination.
I’d also expect a narrative to emerge around creativity and innovation. In theory at least, new technologies will take away some of the drudgery of our working lives and liberate us to concentrate on creativity and innovation. Indeed it’s worth noting that in the UK, there is a growing strength in creative areas: in the second half of last year, British film, TV and music production increased its output by 12 percent. These are not themselves technology industries: but they exploit technology to achieve their creative ends.
As individuals, as organisations and as a society, we have to acknowledge that continuous innovations in technology will have huge consequences on working lives. But we are not simply passive observers: C-3PO is not our master. It is up to all of us to exploit technology rather than allow technology to determine the narrative. There is no doubt that some jobs will disappear, and some rungs in traditional career ladders will vanish. We must accept that. We will have to adapt – moving from one of these notional ladders to another over our working life, or even building a new ladder that we and others can climb. New employment opportunities will emerge. It simply requires us to be sufficiently fleet of foot – anticipating, adapting, learning – to grasp the full potential of technology and make the most of this extraordinary era of innovation and longevity we are living through.
You must be a registered user to add a comment here. If you’ve already registered, please log in. If you haven’t registered yet, please register and log in.Login/Create a Profile