The unhealthy road not taken: Licensing indulgence by exaggerating counterfactual sins
Journal
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Subject
Organisational Behaviour
Publishing details
Authors / Editors
Effron D A; Monin B; Miller D T
Biographies
Publication Year
2013
Abstract
This research examined two hypotheses: 1) reflecting on foregone indulgences licenses people to indulge, and 2) to justify future indulgence, people will exaggerate the sinfulness of actions not taken, thereby creating the illusion of having previously foregone indulgence. In Study 1 (a longitudinal study), dieters induced to reflect on unhealthy alternatives to their prior behavior (compared to dieters in a control condition) expressed weaker intentions to pursue their weight-loss goals — and one week later, they said that they had actually done less and intended to continue doing less to pursue such goals. In Study 2, weight-conscious participants who expected to eat cookies (compared to those merely shown cookies) inflated the unhealthiness of snack foods that they previously declined to eat, and exaggerated the extent to which dieting concerns explained why they had declined these snacks. Implications for moral behavior, self-control, and motivated construal processes are discussed.
Keywords
Licensing; Dieting; Counterfactual thinking; Morality; Self-control
Available on ECCH
No
