Skip to main content

Please enter a keyword and click the arrow to search the site

The costs and benefits of asymmetric performance fees in mutual funds



Publishing details

Social Sciences Research Network

Authors / Editors

Servaes H;Sigurdsson K


Publication Year



This paper compares the returns, expenses, and risk-taking of mutual funds that charge performance fees with mutual funds that do not. Funds with performance fees earn risk-adjusted returns annually that are about 50 basis points below those of other funds, a result mostly due to a subset funds that do not set a stochastic benchmark against which performance is measured or that set a benchmark that is easy to beat. As a result, these funds charge total expenses, including the performance fee, that are substantially higher than those of funds without a performance fee structure. Using gross value added as a measure of skill, we find some evidence of skill for the median performance fee manager, but value added is zero, on average. There is no evidence that funds with performance fees are more volatile than other funds and only limited evidence that such funds increase risk during the second half of the year when they are below the performance fee threshold during the first half of the year; they do take on more active risk, however. Our results indicate that investors should pay particular attention to the benchmarks employed to compute whether performance fees are paid. These findings also inform the current debate in the European Union and the United Kingdom on the merits of performance fees.


Performance fees in mutual funds; Fund returns; Value added; Fund expenses; Risk-taking incentives


Social Sciences Research Network

Available on ECCH


Select up to 4 programmes to compare

Select one more to compare
subscribe_image_desktop 5949B9BFE33243D782D1C7A17E3345D0

Sign up to receive our latest news and business thinking direct to your inbox